Is Premier League Actually Easier To Win Than The Champions League?



There are 2 main trophies that every English team strives to win season in, season out – the Premier League and the Champions League. No matter how much of these trophies clubs win, they always want more.

But the question is; which of these two trophies – the Champions League and the Premier League – is tougher to win?

We will not be giving an answer to this question. You will be giving us your answer. But what we will be doing in this video is to make arguments for each side to help you get to your answer. Are you ready? Let’s get down to it.

If you have any copyright issues, please don’t strike this video, just send me an e-mail (goal90yt@gmail.com) and I will remove this video right away or we will find another solution. «Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for «fair use» for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.» I DO NOT OWN ANY COPYRIGHT.

MINICONJUNTO PRIMERA EQUIPACIÓN REAL MADRID NIÑO Grossistes maillot de foot pas cher chine de la Chine maillot de foot pas cher chine Grossistes,Ventes en gros et bien plus

36 comentarios

  3. Premier league has more money. Champions league is mostly fluke tournament.

    Premier league is really won only on skill. Yes Champions league is big name but I think Premier League means you are more skilled team over the period of 38 weeks. Not just fluke victories in 7 8 knock out round games.

  6. It depends on how you see the difficulty; The UCL is like a Track and Field race, you put in all your effort from the beginning, making sure you don't slip up, or make a mistake, because even the slightest of those things could see you out of the competition. Leagues, (and i used "Leagues" because this logic doesn't only apply to the EPL), is more like a marathon, you have to be consistent, and hope your opponents are not as consistent, there are rooms for mistakes, and slip ups, but you have to make sure not to make too many, and really kick into full gear at the end if you're battling with other teams for the title…
    So the UCL is short, or at least shorter, but almost always difficult, hectic, almost no room for mistakes, and you have to be precise; while leagues are long, it is more lenient in regards to it can give room for mistakes, but you have to have consistency if you want to win it…

    Now, on which is more prestigious, that's not even a question; to even get into the UCL, you have to have done well in your league the previous season, the UCL is an exclusive competition for the elites of Europe, the winners are literally the Kings of Europe, and the last time i checked, being Kings of Europe(football wise) triumphs over being Kings of a country in Europe.

  10. I don't know how one can argue against that, just look how many of the ucl final teams were the champions of their leagues, luck is really relevant in the ucl but in league format the champions have to win week in week out against teams who are holding for dear life or they are really good

  11. I don't know how one can argue against that, just look how many of the ucl final teams were the champions of their leagues, luck is really relevant in the ucl but in league format the champions have to win week in week out against teams who are holding for dear life or they are really good

  12. For underdogs its easier to win champions league and for the favourites it’s probably easier to win the league as 38 games to show their quality whereas one bad game and you are eliminated from the ucl

  19. You can go through a knockout round in the UCL by luck or a bad decision and you can win the UCL for the same reasons…
    Over the course of an EPL season the bad decisions have a chance to even themselves out..
    In a nutshell the EPL is harder.!

  21. Lol…

    Just becoz you are to do more work to get something done, it doesn’t mean your work is hard

    Scenario 1
    A guy who works in Mc d flips over a 1000 burgers a day

    Scenario 2
    a partner in Goldman Sachs is sitting in his air conditioned office with a super hot assistant at his side, both discussing about whether the billion dollar deal/contract in question is worth signing/not

    Whose job is harder？

    Any idiot can get a job in Mc d and do burger flipping from day to night

  24. For me the league is the bigger personal achievement but Ucl is harder and more professionally recognised however; paradoxically doesn't need more skill… because the difficulty is in the luck element needed to win it because of the ko format.
    Separately, It seems a bit weird to me how you can be the "champion of champions" without actually being the champions of anything.
    You can be, on paper, the best team and still lose UCL.. that doesn't happen in the league unless you get a freak season like Leicester.

  26. Champions league is harder because every team is giving their best whole the PL when you are playing the bottom half it’s not even a challenge you can destroy them if you choose man city will destroy everyone in the PL but can’t win the CL that says it all.

  27. I believe PL is harder.

    In another video I read a comment that stated the following " Champions League is harder, ask Manchester City, they have won the PL several times in the last couple of years but not the CL".

    I partially agree with that comment, but there are other factors to it.

    In 2018 when Guardiola won his first PL title with City, Liverpool also got to the CL final, losing to Madrid.
    Liverpool finished that PL season on 4th place (75 pts.) 25 points behind City (100 pts.)

    The next year, in 2019. Man City won the PL title just one point (98 pts.) above Liverpool (97 pts.). That same year Liverpool got to the CL final winning against Tottenham whom finished the PL in 4th place (71 pts.).
    Right up until this point neither Liverpool nor Tottenham had previously won the PL.

    In 2020 COVID happened and Liverpool was able to win the PL with 99 points but wasn't able to reach the Championship League Final. Man City finished that season Iin second with 81 points, and also wasn't able to reach the CL final.

    In 2021, there was once again an English CL final. Chelsea vs Man City, the first City CL final under Guardiola, they finished that PL season on 1st place with 86 points to a fourth place premier league team, Chelsea with 67 points.
    Chelsea went onto win the CL final that year.

    In 2022, Liverpool got to CL final with 92 points in the PL , once again they lost the league just one point behind Man City with 93 points. Liverpool lose the final against Madrid, once again.

    This facts are just since Guardiola joined Man City in 2016. In the 2016 – 2017 PL season Chelsea won the league but did not compete in that edition on the CL.

    For English teams it is either the Premier League or the Champions League, it is more likely for PL 2nd places and 4th places to reach the CL final and win it rather than winning the actual league.

    That's what I think, but I agree to disagree

  29. The Champions League is only good when it gets past The round of 16 the Premier League is better because you have to be more consistent to win it because there is more games in the Premier League than in the Champions League

  33. Actually it is not necessary 3 games to need to win in champions league you could win the champions league without winning any game in group stage if every game in your group is a draw and you score most goals and draw every knockout game and win every knockout round by penalty shout-out and draw final and win final by penalty shout-out you could win with 0% win rate in primer league too if every game of season was a draw and you scored the most goals the champions league is harder to win than primer league because champions league is from teams all across Europe while primer league is teams all across England

  34. PL is about consistency and being the absolute best across 38 games and against CL participants and potential CL winners whom you have to play twice.

    CL is about key moments and you can avoid top sides to make it to the final.
    ——-
    PL is nothing like what it used to be you cannot drop points anymore and you have to play at an elite level almost perfect and consistently hit 90+ points to win each season. That is insane.

  35. U can win the UCL in 7 games the EPL goes for 10 months. UCL is based on luck depends what draw u get. The EPL is about consistency. In UCL u don't need to be the best team in ur league but u can still win the UCL. For example in 2000 Madrid finish 6th in La Liga but they won UCL cuz they got the easy draw to get to the final. Same with Liverpool 05 and Chelsea 2012 both finished 5th but won the UCL cuz of easy draw going to the final.

    In EPL u can claim to be the best in the league considering u played every team home and away for 38 games. In UCL u don't play everybody u only play what's given to u. There's more weight being EPL champions vs being champions of UCL. Plus the prize money winning the EPL is far way more money winning the UCL

Los comentarios están cerrados.